[MD] Intellect's Symposium

[John Carl]

Mary,

I thank you for your constructive criticism and will consider it deeply.

There.

Done.

I'm a quick thinker.

Here's the issue, luv, I write what I damn well please and when horse kicks
me off I'm gone.

In the mean time, read what you like and delete what you don't.  It's the
way.

Got it?

Good.

John

PS:  I'm tired of refuting the charges of Hegelianism, they're ridiculous
and ill-thought-out. I assert Royce is Pirsigian through and through and I
haven't had one logical, rational, philosophically valid arguement against
that position since I joined this forum and all the reading I've done since
has only confirmed my earlier hunch.  If you wanna seriously engage the
scholar on the subject, read the material and get back to me.




On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Mary <marysonthego at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello John,
>
> I love you.  You are a great writer at times and have immense potential. I
> look forward to reading your book someday.  I appreciate your talent and
> hope to see more of your writing; however, we are not here to discuss
> Royce,
> other than in whatever terms he can be juxtaposed with Pirsig.  The subject
> at hand is the definition of Pirsig's Intellectual Level as it relates to
> the Metaphysics of Quality.  DMB (hi Dave, nice to hear from you again!  I
> was around when you were first posting and remember), DMB points out,
> rightly so, that you (and apparently this Royce) are Hegelists.  That's
> fine, but is not germane to the conversation. Spare me the Royce quotes
> unless they relate to the MoQ in some way.
>
> Thank you John,
>
> Mary
>
> - The most important thing you will ever make is a realization.
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>