[MD] grmbl

[plattholden at gmail.com]

On 1 Jun 2010 at 5:57, Andre Broersen wrote:

Platt to Andre:

Thus, your meaning of subjects and objects in "the MOQ
context" is known and believed only by you, me and a handful contributors and
lurkers here, to the rest of the world's detriment such as we are witnessing
today.

Andre:
Thanks for your response Platt,and to just clarify, 'objects' in the MOQ 
context are inorganic and organic patterns of value and 'subjects' are social 
and intellectual patterns of value, right?

Platt
Right, according to Pirsig. But, some of questioned this comparison. It imposes 
S/O standards and values on the MOQ.

Andre
But this 'known and believed' you are referring to; where has this process 
taken place? Surely not at the intellectual level since this is SOM...according 
to SOMe.

Platt
As described by Pirsig, S/O began to preserve social values and then took off 
on purposes of its own, becoming the intellectual level (better named the 
individual level because it because it opposes collectivist values.)