[MD] Reading & Incomprehension

[Andre Broersen]

Bodvar to Andre:

I understand, but for Heaven sake WHY?

Andre:
Because one is from a static perspective and the other from a dynamic perspective. Please Bodvar, you do realize the (experiential) difference between the two?!

Bodvar:
The SOL interpretation has much less "bits and pieces" that the Quality/MOQ one.

Andre:
Clearly not because to accommodate your SOL interpretation you have to invent a new level from somewhere which messes up a wonderful MOQ.

Bodvar:
As shown in "The Summary" the Quality/MOQ is created by Pirsig.

Andre:
Yes, and he is very consistent. YOU are the one that makes it into a meta-metaphysics.

Bodvar:
Problem with you is not having understanding the initial metaphysical
inside-out turn that makes value the base of everything, thus static
value is value too while you treat SQ as some latter-day equivalent of
SOM's "objective".

Andre:
And this is entirely your interpretation of the 'inside-out turn' and SQ as having a so called 'objective' status. The IDEA that there were inorganic- and organic patterns of value before sentience is a high quality intellectual pattern of value because of empirical/scientific evidence.

Bodvar:
Sure, we live within the static range, DQ is too dangerous to play with. Phaedrus did and paid a heavy price, but it brought us the MOQ and it must not be squandered.

Andre:
The inside-out turn again Bodvar. Phaedrus did not play with DQ. DQ played with him...you are objectifying DQ...and must add that the MOQ is 'squandered' in your SOL=intellect hands.