[MD] Transhumanism

[Joseph Maurer]

On 6/16/10 5:33 AM, "Krimel" <Krimel at Krimel.com> wrote:

> [Joe]
> I have locked
> myself into a cage with ³1² so that maybe 2 will make sense.  I think I see
> the 1 of mathematics and logic, but I am damned if I can corral the ³1² of
> evolution except by a word ³individuation².  To go from 1 to a ³higher
> intellectual² capability is an evolutionary stretch that I don¹t see
> clearly.  
> 
> [Krimel]
> I am pretty sure that one or the other of these series has a book to help
> cure whatever ails you. But it seems to me that the problem isn't getting
> from 1 to 2 but in getting from 0 to 1. That can also cause headaches. While
> traveling the rail system in Boston we passed a building on Beacon St. with
> the address 1101 printed in large letters. I thought to myself isn't 13 an
> unlucky number?

 
Hi Krimel and all,
 
Imho  Emotions are DQ only and can change our thoughts.  Evolution in
consciousness from an emotional level 0, DQ only, continues to a defined SQ
1 the intellectual level.
 
I cannot discover any evolutionary movement from a social level to an
intellectual level.  The social reality is formed in the intellectual
level’s static behavior for the necessities in consciousness for organic
procreation.  
 
The emotional level DQ only consciousness precedes evolution to the willful
activity in consciousness at the intellectual level.   The S/O intellectual
level is the only SQ in the evolution of DQ consciousness.
 
I evolve from an undefined emotional DQ level to a defined intellectual 1.
The emotional level DQ remains undefined, and emotional/intellectual
squabbles are not uncommon.
 
Joe