[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[plattholden at gmail.com]

On 21 Jun 2010 at 5:40, craigerb at comcast.net wrote:

> [Platt]
> > what I perceive is actually I-perceiving. Otherwise, all perceptions 
> > are something I have. Then I'm forced to say that I perceive myself.
> > Now, who is this I that perceives myself? Another self -- a second self?
> > And who has this perception of a second self?
> > A third self? How many selves must I postulate?
> 
> 
> 
> But if "what I perceive is actually me perceiving",
> then the same regress occurs. Because me perceiving is
> me perceiving me perceiving & so on.
> Craig    
 
Exactly. When you split experience into subject/object you fall into infinite 
regress, and Quality is nowhere to be found. 

Platt