[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics
Andre Broersen
andrebroersen at gmail.com
Thu Jun 24 01:16:33 PDT 2010
Marsha to Andre:
Andre, the evangelist?
Andre:
No, the only evangelist I seem to remember bearing the name 'Andreas' was taken care of by the Romans: they crossed the wood and hanged him...upside down...as his request. He felt himself unworthy to die in the same manner as his master. (is this about right John?)
Marsha:
I find both Bo and Platt exhibit great respect for Mr. Pirsig's intellectual capacity and achievement.
Andre:
By calling the things he said 'nonsense'? By suggesting that the Phaedrus of LILA had 'lost nerve'? By dismissing most of LC annotations as 'confusing' and pandering to SOM 'pressure'?
Somewhere in ZMM, after they have come down from the mountain, Chris tells his Dad; You're not very brave, are you? To which his Dad replies, that may be so but you'll be surprised how smart I am.
I think Bodvar and Platt underestimate the smartness of the MOQ and all Mr. Pirsig has said about it.
Marsha:
You are insisting on one truth when RMP has clearly stated that the MoQ supports multiple truths,
Andre:
Yes, about static quality but not about the MOQ itself...Mr. Pirsig has clearly indicated some limits to how to interpret the MOQ. He has made this clear especially in the Annotations. He has said openly that Platt's and Bodvar's interpretation 'undermines' the MOQ.
Ooopps, I forgot: Bodvar sees the MOQ as BEING Reality, Experience,Quality! Of course! Ahh,this clears the confusion and anything goes.............?
Marsha:
I am sorry if things for you are on the chaotic side.
Andre:
Not really chaotic Marsha. I just make sure that I regularly change the oil, check the gas-level in the tank, see if the tyres don't wear down too low, and make sure the chain is on the correct tension.
But thank you for your concern.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list