[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[Platt Holden]

On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>wrote:

> :
>
> Yes, about static quality but not about the MOQ itself...Mr. Pirsig has
> clearly indicated some limits to how to interpret the MOQ. He has made this
> clear especially in the Annotations. He has said openly that Platt's and
> Bodvar's interpretation 'undermines' the MOQ.
>
>
No. He said Platt's conclusion -- "The MOQ is the best S/O answer I've found
yet." -- undermines the MOQ, meaning by emphasizing the necessary use of S/O
language to convey the MOQ its "essence" may be compromised, reducing its
value.

Platt.



>
>