[MD] The Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics

[MarshaV]

On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> And if you cannot prove my interpretation is wrong, it is an interpretation
> that is as correct as yours.  YOUR loop continues; my interpretation
> allows for multiple static truths.
> 
> Andre:
> And my suggestion is that the MOQ is not looking for 'static truths' at all.
> It simply points towards experience:DQ

If the Moq is not considering static truths, RMP should have kept his 
mouth shut, but he didn't so all static utterances should be on the table 
for consideration.  Ignore what  you please.   


> Rituals, ceremonies, prayers do not and cannot express the heart of what
> Mr. Pirsig is suggesting.

Huh?  Do you have Mr Pirsig's heart?  I wish I did.   


> Don't believe anything because you have read LILA.

Huh?  Are you Andre, writing a Thus Spoke Andre?  You words
may have meaning for you, but for me:

	Quality(unpatterned experience/patterned experience)  


> Don't put your faith in reports,or tradition, or hearsay,or the authority of
> religious leaders or texts.  

I always validate.  That is why I cannot accept what you say without 
an evidence.


> Don't rely on mere logic, or appearances, or speculation'( Hagan,
> Buddhism Plain and Simple).

I suppose this is your way to elude my request for evidence.   To change 
the subject is one of your strategies.   

I've not only read the book, I have practiced meditation and mindfulness 
long before reading Hagen's book.  


> You see Marsha, I can play your game as well. Talking about loops!

Who made you great leader?  You speak like a little self.   

 

Marsha
 
 
 

 
___