[MD] Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox

[david buchanan]

Dear no name:
The mission of the fixed point foundation is to defend Christianity. Dawkins is a scientific materialist. As I understand it, Pirsig rejects both of those options. Instead, he offers a way to unify art, science and religion so that they are not at odds with each other. As I like to put it, the MOQ aims for beautiful science, intelligent art and religion that isn't threatened by either of those things. 

Thanks,
dmb

> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:30:15 -0500
> From: nomdeplumeweb at gmail.com
> To: moq_discuss at lists.moqtalk.org
> Subject: [MD] Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox
> 
> Howdy Folks,
> 
> This is my first post.  I offer it because I could think of no others
> who may best appreciate what I may have stumbled into.
> 
> The link below goes to an excerpt of a debate between Richard Dawkins
> and John Lennox.  The debate was hosted by the Fixed Point Foundation.
> 
> While watching the first six minutes I could only think that both men,
> unknowingly, had managed to talk around and misattributed the role of
> Pirsig's Quality.
> 
> If my distilled understanding of ZMM is correct, then this is the very
> situation which Pirsig tried to resolve and unify.
> 
> Watch, and think, for yourselves.
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBbBenCTTwE
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3