[MD] MD FW: The intellectual level and rationality

Michael Hamilton thethemichael at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 08:31:59 PST 2005


Bo, this is just a brief message of support.

> Again, ZMM sees the early search for principles beyond the
> myths as the embryonic S/O. The principles "objective" and the
> old myths just "subjective". When will this sink in?

Soon, if you continue to explain yourself as succinctly as this!

The following is worth quoting too:

>     "The Metaphysics of Quality resolves the relationship between
>     intellect and society, subject and object, mind and matter, by
>     embedding all of them in a larger system of understanding.  Objects
>     are inorganic and biological values; subjects are social and
>     intellectual values.  They are not two mysterious universes that go
>     floating around in some subject-object dream that allows them no real
>     contact with one another.  They have a matter-of-fact evolutionary
>     relationship." [LILA, p344]
>
> The impossible thing about this way of "encasing" the SOM inside
> the MOQ is that it sounds as if SOM still is valid: that societies
> are in our minds and that biology is "out there". This is out of
> tune with the MOQ that has declare the SOM nil an void.  and
> consequently can have no relevance to its own levels this way.

This is of crucial importance.

Regards,
Mike



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list