[MD] MD FW: The intellectual level and rationality
skutvik at online.no
skutvik at online.no
Thu Dec 15 08:54:41 PST 2005
Ian
You spoke thus:
> How could you possibly accuse Paul (or I) of working AGAINST releasing
> intellect from anything.
Releasing intellect? I spoke about him hindering the MOQ to tear
loose from intellect's grip. Earlier you had written:
> > The lesson is to recognise the child-like simplicity, not to learn
> > something more intellectual, in order to unederstand.
And I agreed, it's my very point to see the MOQ as something
beyond the 4th level ("beyond intellect" sounds like giving up
one's senses). And the SOL represents that child-like simplicity.
> In fact we have been constatly suggesting
> it's your very act of setting up intelect as SOMism / SOL that is
> creating that prison.
It's not me suggesting anything but written all over LILA and
ZMM. It has been confirmed by Pirsig. See the next paragraph.
> A fossilised pattern I called it. I couldn't be
> working harder for the opposite if I tried.
The SOM is "fossilised" all right, but the quality of the S/O divide
cannot be jettisoned without us slipping back to the dark ages.
Therefore it is best encapsuled as the 4th level. The original
definition of this level as "mind" where ideas pop up and
disappear is rejected and in the same letter Pirsig said that the
Greeks "developed intellect" and this confirms that intellect is the
S/O. How can this slow and inevitable move in the SOL way pass
by unnoticed?
I chose to ignore your parting "greeting", you are not the kind to
revert to foul language or hurt silence when arguments fail.
Bo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list