[MD] New Model Army, Mystic(DQ) Experience, and Religion (SQ) as Power
Ant McWatt
antmcwatt at hotmail.co.uk
Wed Aug 2 03:12:11 PDT 2006
Steve H quoted Einstein August 1st:
I do not think that it is necessarily the case that science and religion
are natural opposites. In fact, I think that there is a very close
connection between the two. Further, I think that science without religion
is lame and, conversely, that religion without science is blind. Both are
important and should work hand-in-hand.
(Found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein)
>See even the greatest scientist of the 20th century was religious.
Steve,
That last statement is true as far as it goes but it needs to be qualified
as regarding the term religious.
Firstly, Einstein identified himself culturally as a Jew but one who had
lost his faith.
Secondly, if you read Einsteins very readable The World As I See It (New
York, 1949, p.28-29) you will note that when he is speaking about religion
it is in the sense of harmony as illustrated by Poincaré in ZMM rather than
the more traditional sense you are suggesting:
You will hardly find one among the profounder sort of scientific minds
without a peculiar religious feeling of his own. But it is different from
the religion of the naive man. For the latter God is a being from whose care
one hopes to benefit and whose punishment one fears; a sublimation of a
feeling similar to that of a child for its father, a being to whom one
stands to some extent in a personal relation, however deeply it may be
tinged with awe. But the scientist is possessed by the sense of universal
causation. The future, to him, is every whit as necessary and determined as
the past. There is nothing divine about morality, it is a purely human
affair. His religious feeling takes the form of a rapturous amazement at the
harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority
that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human
beings is an utterly insignificant reflection. This feeling is the guiding
principle of his life and work, in so far as he succeeds in keeping himself
from the shackles of selfish desire. It is beyond question closely akin to
that which has possessed the religious geniuses of all ages.
Anyway, to cut to the chase, I think the issue of religion (and especially
the exploitation of Fundamentalist Christians by neo-cons) is just one of
those smokescreens often used by unscrupulous politicians to ensure their
materially comfortable lifestyle continues. The War on Terror is another
myth designed to scare the US and UK population into being more submissive
and pliable for the same end. More detail for these points is provided by
the Power of Nightmares TV documentary that Khaled and Arlo recently
highlighted; the entire scripts for the documentary being at:
http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
Finally, I still think that most everyday people calling themselves
Christians or Muslims are sincere about their beliefs but, to return to a
point I made a couple of days ago, if you rely on the static baggage of
someone else (whether thats a parent or the Catholic Church) when dealing
the Divine (rather than approach it directly), youre going to leave
yourself open to political and financial exploitation. This type of
exploitation is also why writers such as Mark Twain implied that anyone who
_wants_ to hold high office should be carefully scrutinised for their
motivations in doing so!
Best wishes,
Anthony.
.
_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list