[MD] Drama
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu Aug 31 11:20:59 PDT 2006
[Platt]
So anyone who criticizes the Academy is a right-wing ideologue?
[Arlo]
No. In my post I was critical of aspects of the Academy as well. But, as
Pirsig points out, "right wing politics" has always been about condemning
the Academy. You, a devotee of right-wing ideology, have expressed the same
ideological mandated criticisms of the Academy as those that labeled Pirsig
himself a "radical professor".
[Platt]
Then you qualify based on your perennial vilification of the "business
model" of education.
[Arlo]
I base my observations on experience in the Academy. Years of studying
instructional methodology, educational pedagogy and interest in the
historical-social evolution of a contextually placed concept of "learning".
Years of working with both undergraduate and graduate students, and
witnessing the changing context and the ramifications of business dialogue
on the actual practice in the classroom. I do not base them on expectations
of party ideology, unless you think the one party platform is about greater
emphasis on the Arts and Literature in the Academy, or how the Academy is
enrolling too many people. Or how too may are admitted who do not belong
there at that point in their lives.
[Platt]
I also remind you that education in art, theater, literature, history,
etc., traditionally the humanities, was emphasized in the Victorian era.
[Arlo]
As it was during the Renaissance. And in Ancient Greece... and Ancient
Egypt, where the Greeks often studied. And, back then they had the fortune
of not bearing a culture that divorced "art" from "technology", as Pirsig
reminds us.
[Platt]
Further, in that era, graduates from high school knew how to read and write.
[Arlo]
People do what they value. Isn't that the fundamental lesson of the MOQ? If
people are not "reading and writing", it is because they do not value it.
Make someone value it, and you won't be able to stop them. The educational
system is only as strong as the desires of those in its halls.
[Platt]
Educationally speaking, a return to that era would be a good thing wouldn't
you agree?
[Arlo]
In some ways. But "basics" is not the answer. What good is a population
that can read- and understand!- Dr. Seuss but not Robert Pirsig? The
paradigm shift must occur on the cultural level. Our schools can bang
fingers, and smack kids with rulers, and force everyone's penmanship to
pristine levels, but if it is not valued culturally, and in that same
regard valued individually, it will be for naught. When DMB reminds us that
the majority of people can't find Japan on a map, the problem is not a
faulty school system, but a culture that devalues such knowledge. I mean,
if people WANTED to know where Japan was, who could stop them from finding out?
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list