[MD] Quantum Physics

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

>From: Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Subject: Re: [MD] Quantum Physics
>Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:41:38 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>      [Ant]
> > To say quantum physics is "The interaction point
> > between [all] DQ and SQ"
> > doesn't seem to lay right with me as that same
> > sentence could be describing
> > the continual interaction between an artist and a
> > canvass or other
> > interactions which are part of the macro world (for
> > instance, in the
> > biological and social realms) rather the micro
> > world.  In other words, the
> > definition you give above is too reductionist
> > (towards ontological
> > materialism)!
>
>      Not if you are aware that the code of art is an
>event for all levels, as dq is split from sq.  So, the
>"The interaction point between [all] DQ and SQ" is ok,
>except for somebody put [all] in that sentence.  Yet,
>again, quality talk doesn't notice distinctions, but
>if we are discerning and making distinctions then,
>yes, quantum physics can't be "The interaction point
>between [all] DQ and SQ", yet, quantum physics is
>""The interaction point between DQ and SQ".  (Notice
>[all] is gone.)

Hi SA

If quality talk doesn't notice distinctions then what prevents gibberish?

Perhaps the MOQ would say quantum physics is a package of highly specialized 
intellectual patterns of value. Not at all as romantic as you make it sound 
but still highly effective.

Dan