[MD] Quantum Physics

[Heather Perella]

     [Ant]
> To say quantum physics is "The interaction point
> between [all] DQ and SQ" 
> doesn't seem to lay right with me as that same
> sentence could be describing 
> the continual interaction between an artist and a
> canvass or other 
> interactions which are part of the macro world (for
> instance, in the 
> biological and social realms) rather the micro
> world.  In other words, the 
> definition you give above is too reductionist
> (towards ontological 
> materialism)!

     Not if you are aware that the code of art is an
event for all levels, as dq is split from sq.  So, the
"The interaction point between [all] DQ and SQ" is ok,
except for somebody put [all] in that sentence.  Yet,
again, quality talk doesn't notice distinctions, but
if we are discerning and making distinctions then,
yes, quantum physics can't be "The interaction point
between [all] DQ and SQ", yet, quantum physics is
""The interaction point between DQ and SQ".  (Notice
[all] is gone.)  

A?

woods,
SA


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com