[MD] Quantum Physics

[Heather Perella]

> Dan comments:
> In the second sentence he 
> answers all the questions that have arisen in this
> thread.  (the second sentence) "Since at the most
> primary level the observed and the observer are both
> intellectual assumptions, the paradoxes of quantum
theory
> have to be conflicts of intellectual assumption, not
just
> conflicts of what is observed." 

     The code of art comes into play here.  The
observed and observer are based on assumptions,
intellectual ones.  The observed is based on SOM.  The
observer is assuming SOM fits in here.  Pirsig is
saying rid the assumptions and 'go with' what the slit
experiment is doing and don't question what it is
doing, don't be surprised.  The codification of
quantum physics into an intellectual understanding,
not based on SOM, takes a code of art perspective. 
This is basically what I hear Pirsig saying here.  


     [Dan G.]
In the third sentence he is eliminating any possible
knowledge of
> Dyanmic Quality in 
> static quality terms.

     ok

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com