[MD] Quantum Physics

[Heather Perella]

> [Laird]
> I suppose in the way you've been using the 'code of
> art', yes.

     Nobody has been commenting otherwise as to the
code of art.  


     [Laird]
>The quantum collapse or DQ-interaction are 'creative
> triggers' upon reality, 
> including consciousness.  The 'split' of quality
from
> DQ to SQ (code of 
> art, DQ-interaction) can also be viewed as quantum
> collapse. The 
> spontaneous reduction of
> everything/nothing/probability into reality. DQ 
> creating SQ. These statements are all pointing at
> the same thing, and 
> all these phrases describe a single phenomenon.

     That's why I agree with DM's nothingness ripples
everywhere.  For the code of art is not really a code,
it is dynamic morality.  To say morality is dynamic,
is to say morality is nothing.  To say morality is
quality, is to say quality is nothing.  I've sqed
this.

woods,
SA


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index