[MD] Quantum Physics

[Khaled Alkotob]

Ham, Laird, Dan

It's been interesting following this, and in another thread Platt asked
the question if to each his own as the end result is the same in reaching
quality.

I am out of my league here, and do not have the proper tools to elaborate
but the premise of my idea is as follows:

Until Calculus came along, certain computations could not be made. in the
paragraph at the bottom of the page there is a mention of the collision
between subject and object at a moment in time.

Well in a way that what calculus was able to do. Figure out such things
as acceleration and declaration at a moment in time.

It's in a way going from, to 2 to 3 to a forth dimension and beyond

Our way of thinking (western) is defined/limited by how we are raised and
how we perceive things.

So does exist such a thing as the calculus of thought?

Algebra help as to enumerate our world, geometry help us define the 3
dimensional world
The next step is interrelating ideas, sort of a 3 dimensional spider web,
where subject-object relations can be defined, and not just left as
abstract ideas

Just a thought

Khaled


> Ham offered this bit of wisdom on Dec. 3:
> 
> "Quality cannot be independently derived from either mind or matter. 
> But it
> can be derived from the relationship of mind and matter with each 
> other.
> Quality occurs at the point at which subject and object meet. 
> Quality is not
> a thing. It is an event. It is the event at which the subject 
> becomes aware
> of the object. And because without objects there can be no subject, 
> quality
> is the event at which awareness of both subjects and objects is made
> possible. Quality is not just the result of a collision between 
> subject and
> object. The very existence of subject and object themselves is 
> deduced from
> the Quality event. The Quality event is the cause of the subjects 
> and
> objects, which are then mistakenly presumed to be the cause of the 
> Quality!"
>     --[Pirsig: SODV, page 11]
> Ham:
> Does this sound like an interaction of "quantum probabilities" to 
> you?
> (end of quote)
>