[MD] 1961 Paper - "Quality in Freshman Writing"

[Dan Glover]

Hello everyone

>From: "Michael Hamilton" <thethemichael at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Subject: Re: [MD] 1961 Paper - "Quality in Freshman Writing"
>Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:39:13 +0000
>
>First off, big thanks to Ian for getting hold of this, and thanks also
>to Bob, if he's reading this, for supplying it!

Hi Michael

Thank you for bringing the matter up. It is a good paper. I enjoyed reading 
it.

>
>I'd been wondering if this piece would show some kind of different
>perspective from ZMM and Lila - after all, this is the first thing
>we've seen written by the "Phaedrus" of ZMM, before
>insanity/enlightenment and the electrodes... but on first reading,
>this doesn't seem to be the case. The crucial passage from ZMM about
>the "many marvellous analogues" etc is there just the same. This whole
>part of ZMM about teaching quality and the subsequent waves of
>crystallisation was always the part that blew me away, so it's useful
>to have it against in a slightly different and more self-contained
>form.

I've always been under the impression that the MOQ crystalized in Robert 
Pirsig's mind at the peyote meeting so it's interesting to read another 
perspective.

>
>Anyway, I hadn't asked to see this paper with the intention of prying
>into the development of Phaedrus's psyche or whatever... I asked to
>see it because I'm now a university first-year, and struggling to
>write. Academic essays, though. Not creative composition. But perhaps
>the difference between the two isn't so great. If rotisserie assemply
>is a form of sculpture, then writing an essay is easily a form of
>creative composition. There's no single way of doing it, it's a craft.

Like any worthwhile endeavor, to write well requires a great deal of work. I 
think the key is to make it look easy. To do that, a writer has to express 
something with every word. Otherwise the reader knows the writer just 
doesn't care. At least this reader feels that way.

>
>I've written lots of essays before, but I've always been uneasy with
>the process of writing, and it was getting more and more tortuous. To
>be honest, even writing this involves annoying levels of
>self-criticism, rather than being a simple, honest flow of
>consciousness. This is a big gumption trap, no doubt about it. Or
>perhaps it stems from a lack of gumption at the outset. Dunno.

A spark of interest and some kindling of thought is a good start. I know 
from the start that most everything I write is trash. If anyone let that 
stop them, there would be no writers at all. Even the greatest writers have 
written just horrible junk.

Still, there's all kinds of gumption traps a person can fall into. Reading 
has worked to spark my writings at those times.

>
>One thing I am sure of: education would be a much better experience
>for everyone if all teachers (at any level) read this paper.

Why not share it with them? Or is that something "that isn't done"?

Don't be a stranger.

Dan