[MD] Social Imposition ?

[Heather Perella]

    By the way, this contributing, this sharing is
social.  What we share can be thoughts.  If we so wish
to get into low-high quality thoughts, this is all
upon the intellectual level, eh?  This low-high
quality thoughts is another angle I've seen described
here.  How we decide which thoughts are low-high,
well, the value upon these thoughts would be decided. 
Who decides?  quality, which includes individuals and
society, decide, thus, evolution decides.  Have
high-quality thoughts been discarded?  Sure, and
latter 'discovered', reiterated, 'explored', and we
all eventually come back to this original present
moment where dq and sq split.

baby hungry,
SA  


>      [Arlo]
> > Indeed, exactly the opposite of your rash
> > condemnation, the more "thinking
> > individuals" contribute to it,
> 
>      The word contribute is important.  
> 
>      A quote from Lila:
>      "What is the purpose of all this intellectual
> knowledge?' the Metaphysics of Quality answers, 'The
> fundamental purpose of knowledge is to Dynamically
> improve and preserve society.' Knowledge has grown
> away from this historic purpose and become an end in
> itself just as society has grown away from its
> original purpose of preserving physical human beings
> and become an end in itself, and this growing away
> from original purposes toward greater Quality is a
> moral growth. But those original purposes are still
> there. And when things get lost and go adrift it is
> useful to remember that point of departure.
> The Metaphysics of Quality suggests that the social
> chaos of the twentieth century can be relieved by
> going back to this point of departure and
> re-evaluating the path taken from it. It says it is
> immoral for intellect to be dominated by society for
> the same reasons it is immoral for children to be
> dominated by their parents. But that doesn't mean
> that
> children should assassinate their parents, and it
> doesn't mean intellectuals should assassinate
> society.
> Intellect can support static patterns of society
> without fear of domination by carefully
> distinguishing
> those moral issues that are social-biological from
> those that are intellectual-social and making sure
> there is no encroachment either way."
> 
>      To contribute, to share thoughts is what
> intellect's, according to this quote, fundamental
> purpose is.  I still view the latter half of this
> quote, as stating, that the kinds of thoughts are
> important.  The intellectual activity is to
> distinguish between the moral codes of
> social-biological and intellectual-social.  This
> quote
> does state intellectual activity has become an end
> in
> itself, but the original purpose is still present,
> and
> when things get lost to ground one upon these
> original
> purposes centers us (a group of individuals).  So,
> distinguish between these moral codes, states to me,
> we are to use our intellect, and provide thoughts,
> thus share with the social level thoughts that
> distinguish these moral codes.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
>
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com