[MD] Intellect battles the[historical] barbarians
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu Nov 2 09:07:24 PST 2006
[Platt]
Now that's funny. On one hand Arlo says his point is "not to point blame."
Then in the next breath he says we should "accept blame where blame is due."
[Arlo]
Note. Entire historical reference to US involvement in Iran and Iraq avoided.
So you're suggesting we shouldn't accept blame where blame is due?
[Platt]
That hilarity aside, note that Arlo thinks "hypocrisy" is a great sin.
[Arlo]
Its evident that you don't think hypocrisy is wrong at all. No surprise
coming from one who's position and philosophy are based in it as opposed to
rational thinking.
[Platt]
But failure of a society to defend itself against biological level
barbarians? Now, that's real MOQ sin!
[Arlo]
A real MOQ sin is attempting to justify everything the US has done with
some blanket cry to "social over biological".
I think we disagree on whether supplying weapons to two sides, one a brutal
dictator the other a fundamentalist regime, enabling one to use chemical
weapons inside and outside its borders, and ignoring human rights
violations while thousands are slaughtered, all to preserve our economic
interests is "society defending itself against barbarians".
[Platt]
Didn't Arlo say at one time that he was against of gun control? But, I
could be wrong.
[Arlo]
Arlo is against selling guns to criminals and violent predators, yes. To
law-abiding citizens, no. People who sell guns to murderers, sit by and
watch as others are killed, and then complain when someone in their family
are killed are blind. Those who can't understand why others who lost
friends to the murder would hate them are stupid.
[Platt]
So we're to blame for trying to stabilize and bring democracy to the Middle
East?
[Arlo]
We have our share of blame for how this "noble goal" was actually acted.
Those who truly believe this to be our "noble goal" would be better served
reading history. Unless you consider arming a brutal dictator against world
outcry, providing him with the means to deploy chemical weapons, ignoring
human rights violations as thousands die, then arming the "other side", a
fundamentalist regime with the sole goal of destabilization while countless
die "bringing stability and democracy". I call it barbaric economic
exploitation.
[Platt]
Maybe Arlo wants to feel guilty about our trying to extend intellectual
values. But, I don't, not for a minute.
[Arlo]
"Extending intellectual values". Hehe. That takes the cake. I am reminded
of Malachi in Steven Spielberg's Children of the Corn, standing there with
a sickle in his hand dripping with blood as he is about to attack yet
again. He looks at the camera and says with a diabolic smile "We've come to
give you peace."
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list