[MD] extricating MOQ from SOM

[Heather Perella]

     [SA]
> >   What I'm saying is that, oh, Marsha mentioned
> >this before and I like the term.  Marsha, what was
> >that term you used?  Not exchange between
> environment
> >and human being, not the word exchange, Marsha you
> >said it was something else?  I believe it is Arlo
> or maybe Ian that use the word emerge, but I'm
> inclined to use whatever Marsha said previously, but
I can't
> >remember it.

     [Marsha] 
> I don't know to which word you are referring. If you
> do not remember 
> it, it probably wasn't such a good word.  I grab
> words to try to 
> define or describe my perspective.  My perspective
> is not built by 
> specific words.  And my perspective is always
> changing.  Maybe 
> _because_ I don't cling to specific words.
> Here are two statements that haven't changed much
> for me, even though 
> my perspective has changed some.  1. 
> Everything-is-connect-to-everything.  2. 
> Everything-is-in-a-constant-state-of-change.
> Maybe the word was interaction?  I don't like the
> sound of that 
> word.  It must be a different word.


     I found it back in the archives.  The word is: 
OVERLAP.  Thus, if I go back to the discussion with
Jim, then subjects and objects are overlapping, and
therefore the world is made up of distinctions that
are overlapping each other in what is called primary
reality.  Our intellect can imagine distinctions, or
we can imagine primary reality.  We can imagine
logical rationalizations with subjects and objects,
and we can overlap these subjects and objects in tune
with primary reality.  Anyways...
Thanks Marsha,
SA     


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Cheap talk?
Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
http://voice.yahoo.com