[MD] extricating MOQ from SOM

[Ham Priday]

[H]:
> HOWEVER -- Pure Nothingness is Absolute.
> And it is possible to theorize a finite universe
> derived from absolute nothingness, as about half
> of the cosmologists have done.  Why do I open
> myself up to this can of worms?
> Because I want to use this opportunity to establish
> a cosmological principle:
> Absolute Truth is absolutely inaccessible to finite
> cognizance. From an existential (infinitesimal)
> perspective Truth is an enigma.

[L]:
> Thus spoke the self-contradictory skeptic:
> It is absolutely true that absolute truth is inaccessible
> to finite cognizance.

Point well taken.  (You have a good logical mind.)  However, I didn't say
that it was an absolute (metaphysical) truth.  Do do you at least
acknowledge it as an 'empirical' truth?

H.