[MD] Fw: Sin
LARAMIE LOEWEN
jeffersonrank1 at msn.com
Thu Nov 16 06:34:57 PST 2006
Dear Marsha,
Excellent quotes. I go back to those all the time.
Cheers,
Laramie
"``The easiest intellectual analogue of pure Quality that people in
our environment can understand is that `Quality is the response of an
organism to its environment' (he used this example because his chief
questioners seemed to see things in terms of stimulus-response
behavior theory). An amoeba, placed on a plate of water with a drip
of dilute sulfuric acid placed nearby, will pull away from the acid
(I think). If it could speak the amoeba, without knowing anything
about sulfuric acid, could say, `This environment has poor quality.'
If it had a nervous system it would act in a much more complex way to
overcome the poor quality of the environment. It would seek
analogues, that is, images and symbols from its previous experience,
to define the unpleasant nature of its new environment and thus
`understand' it.
``In our highly complex organic state we advanced organisms respond
to our environment with an invention of many marvelous analogues. We
invent earth and heavens, trees, stones and oceans, gods, music,
arts, language, philosophy, engineering, civilization and science. We
call these analogues reality. And they are reality. We mesmerize our
children in the name of truth into knowing that they are reality. We
throw anyone who does not accept these analogues into an insane
asylum. But that which causes us to invent the analogues is Quality.
Quality is the continuing stimulus which our environment puts upon us
to create the world in which we live. All of it. Every last bit of it.
``Now, to take that which has caused us to create the world, and
include it within the world we have created, is clearly impossible.
That is why Quality cannot be defined. If we do define it we are
defining something less than Quality itself.'' " (ZMM, Chapter 21)
----- Original Message -----
From: MarshaV<mailto:marshalz at charter.net>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org<mailto:moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Fw: Sin
At 02:07 PM 11/15/2006, Dan wrote:
>Hello everyone
>
> >From: "Micah" <micah at roarkplumbing.com<mailto:micah at roarkplumbing.com>>
> >Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org<mailto:moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
> >To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org<mailto:moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>>
> >Subject: Re: [MD] Fw: Sin
> >Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:07:05 -0600
> >
> >Is a knife moral?
>
>"Quality is morality. Make no mistake about it. They're identical. And if
>Quality is the primary reality of the world then that means morality is also
>the primary reality of the world. The world is primarily a moral order."
>(LILA)
>
> >Of course this is a ridiculous question, as is asking if
> >Capitalism or any other system is moral. People have morals.
>
>The question is only ridiculous from a subject-object perspective. >From the
>MOQ perspective the answer would be: Yes. A knife is primarily a moral
>order. Indeed, the whole world is primarily a moral order. And remember,
>people don't have morals. Morality (Quality) has the people!
>
> >Why people
> >insist on giving human characteristics to non-humans is baffling.
>
>If "man is the measure of all things", then why is this so baffling to you?
>
>It seems that you have one foot planted in SOM and the other foot planted in
>rapidly hardening concrete. It's good to have convictions but only until
>something better (like the MOQ) comes along. A lot of what you say is right
>but in a wrong sort of way, if you get my drift. I think that's what Case is
>getting at too.
>
>Thank you for your comments,
>
>Dan
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org<http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org>
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/<http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/>
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/<http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list