[MD] Nest of Vipers
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu Nov 16 11:43:54 PST 2006
All,
At the risk of stirring up a now-calming nest of vipers, I feel I must
chime in regarding the broohaha that transpired over the Baggini interview.
My apologies upfront to Ant and Horse if this launches more silliness.
With due respect to those who feel the integrity of the MOQ threatened, I
think Ant's editorial authority has been mischaracterized. It would
certainly be an abuse of this power should Ant claim editorial rights over
anything published as "MOQ". Apart from offering his help, if he actually
_demanded_ editorial rights over anything any one of us would consider,
this would constitute a clear immoral transgression of his "authority". If
I wanted to launch a Pirsig-related site, and Ant told me what I could and
what I could not put on that site, this would be an abuse worth condemning.
But we are talking about _his_ site. It may function for some as the
"official" site, but I don't see any such claim made on any of the pages.
On the contrary, the disclaimer is that it is "primarily concerned with the
philosophy of Robert Pirsig". Any reasonable person reading this would
conclude that it is (1) not comprehensive, (2) not canonical, and (3)
expansive per the views of the site author. (To note, even moq.org does not
make a claim to be "official" in any sense. Visitors are told exactly what
it is, what is there, and what to expect.)
Ant and Horse do an amazing job with their respective sites, and I am
thankful they take the time to invest heavily in a resource we can all rely
on. Are there things _I_ would do differently? Maybe. But that's life.
Should anyone be so motivated, however, to do better, the great thing about
the free market is that they can give it their best. Indeed, a quick scan
of DNS availability reveals that many website domains are available for an
intrepid entrepreneur to "do better". For me, I am satisfied with the labor
of Ant and Horse, but those who are not should be encouraged to create a
site that they believe is of a higher quality. (This is, of course, not to
say suggestions should not be made. Quality ones, I'm sure, would be
appreciated, even if they are not used.)
Just my (admittedly late) two cents. (That's what I get for taking time
away from the computer).
Arlo
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list