[MD] tiny skull
pholden at davtv.com
pholden at davtv.com
Sun Nov 19 07:33:54 PST 2006
Quoting craigerb at comcast.net:
> [Platt]
> > why should we consider the Golden Rule moral.
>
> An argument for the morality of the Golden Rule (c):
> 1) It is moral to act appropriately towards people (e.g., reward those who
> deserve rewards, punish those who deserve punishment).
> 2) :. I am acting morally if I act appropriately towards other people.
> 3) :. Other people are acting morally if they act appropriately towards me.
> 4) :. I am acting morally if I act towards other people as they are acting when
> they act appropriately towards me.
> 5) :. It is moral to act according to the Golden Rule.
> Craig
Yes. But the question is how do you decide who deserves rewards and who
deserves punishments? In other words, what does it mean to "act appropriately?"
Platt
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list