[MD] economic pragmatism

David M davidint at blueyonder.co.uk
Wed Nov 22 12:27:26 PST 2006


Case/Mark

Let's start a new political party: LWMS:
less work more sex

David M


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Case" <Case at iSpots.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] economic pragmatism


> [Mark]
> First off, Humans are evolutionary  speaking animals, that is to say,
> biological patterns.
> Therefore,  these patterns should be supported as a matter of  necessity.
>
> [Case]
> Therefore?
> Are you taking logic lessons from Ham?
>
> [Mark]
> 1. All  biologically supporting requirements should be provided free: 
> Food,
>
> water, health care, shelter, energy, and must harmonise with the
> biosphere.
>
> [Case]
> By free do you mean without effort? Can you through in some free sex too 
> or
> would that require effort?
>
> [Mark]
> Note a: We need a Planetary population stable around a  sustainable 
> volume.
> Humans are the basis for a culture of  social and intellectual  patterns.
> Social patterns are imitated which  implies a form of indoctrination.
> Therefore the best patterns for imitating  should be encouraged. These 
> would
>
> appear to include the belief that 1  is basic.
>
> [Case]
> In the US we can't even send rubbers to countries that allow abortion. The
> Chinese are catching all kinds of crap about their draconian family 
> planning
> policies. Short of thinning the herd and massive die offs how do you 
> expect
> to achieve a stable sustainable population?
>
> [Mark]
> 2. Beyond that, caring for others, a distaste for violence, lack  of
> territorial boundary, the encouragement of realising individual  talents,
> provided free, and must not destabilise
>
> 1.Note b: We need a Planetary government which does not bias tribes.
> Social patterns support  intellectual patterns.
> 3. Information must be a free exchange provided free,  and must not
> destabilise 1 and 2.
>
> Note c: Religion must be replaced  by an appreciation of the
> undifferentiated aesthetic  continuum.
> That's my basic framework around which an economic pattern may  be
> developed.
>
> [Case]
> And if there is not universal agreement on this plan for peace and love 
> how
> are you planning to make this happen? Lots of stern talk about moral
> obligations? Or is that going to be the role of the new planetary
> government?
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list