[MD] Essentialism and the MOQ

[Heather Perella]

> [Laird]
> We're in the (E|e)xistence definition problem once
> more. Existence 
> (capital E) is what I call "the whole of SQ".

     ok

> existence (lowercase) is 
> what I call the rationalized, the intellection, into
> your Existence.

    Why use the term existence (lowercase) to describe
rationalized, the intellection?  I do understand we
rationalize and intellectualize 'into' Existence.  I
would say, instead of 'into', that we rationalize and
intellectualize Existence.  Thus, I omit 'into'.  This
provides a different meaning that omits any separation
between intellectual and preintellectual.  One
experiences separation with intellectual and
preintellectual or one experiences
intellectual-preintellectual as one in the same.  This
eventing both ways is Quality.  This keeps the
individuals intact, and the same ground of reality for
these individuals-intact as this is Way.  This last
sentence is trying to speak mu, which as we know, we
can't speak mu, yet, we can speak mu.  We speak dq-we
don't speak dq:  We speak dq is sqing.  We don't speak
dq is sqing dq:  this is quality.  A?
     

woods,
SA


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com