[MD] New Model Army, Mystic(DQ) Experience, and Religion (SQ) as Power

[Robert Robinson]

David M asked dmb:
Never heard of the science theories called big bang or of origin of 
life, or 
speculation on how why we have physical constants, or the origins of 
the 
state, etc, all created things, you must be mis-reading me as usual?

dmb says:
Well, either I am mis-reading you or you are mis-writing me. Again the 
problem, as I see it, is your ability to communicate. Here, for 
example, you 
have rather casually mixed the big bang theory and the theory of human 
origins with the idea of creation. In our world, these are at odds and 
everybody knows it. Creationism is not science. Its religion. Beyond 
the 
fact that your "sentence" is a crime against grammar and the English 
language, it blends opposing ideas about the nature of reality in such 
a way 
that it begs one of the biggest questions in the Western world. And so 
the 
very phrase, "science of creation", is just contradictory nonsense.

   
   
  Maybe this will help:
   
  The Big Bang theory has been kicking around as dirt common subject matter of Cosmology for over 50 years.
   
  The physical constants are discussed in high school physics/chemistry or in basic a bacic college chemistry and "physics 101" class.
   
  On the subject of Creation I wouldn't care to look for guidance in any of the literature of theology (of any religion Christian, Buddhist, etc. you choose)...faith based stuff can't assess that subject matter. Who would want to go there?
   
  Thats why we have scientists with brains, and the scientific method to attempt to find answers to such questions. Failing to access or focus on science in attempting to answer such questions of creation would be a farce and folly to my mind.
  Robbie
  

david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
  David M asked dmb:
Never heard of the science theories called big bang or of origin of life, or 
speculation on how why we have physical constants, or the origins of the 
state, etc, all created things, you must be mis-reading me as usual?

dmb says:
Well, either I am mis-reading you or you are mis-writing me. Again the 
problem, as I see it, is your ability to communicate. Here, for example, you 
have rather casually mixed the big bang theory and the theory of human 
origins with the idea of creation. In our world, these are at odds and 
everybody knows it. Creationism is not science. Its religion. Beyond the 
fact that your "sentence" is a crime against grammar and the English 
language, it blends opposing ideas about the nature of reality in such a way 
that it begs one of the biggest questions in the Western world. And so the 
very phrase, "science of creation", is just contradictory nonsense.

_________________________________________________________________
Find a local pizza place, music store, museum and more
then map the best 
route! http://local.live.com

moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

 		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail.