[MD] guidebook

[ian glendinning]

Ant, and all "friends" ...

I made comment about the wiki too, and raised some questions that were
ignored at the time. Clearly editorial control is needed (like any
good wiki in fact).

Your response highlights an important issue for me.
You use the word "myself".
You and a few others know my view already.

Editorial control of anything that claims to be definitive or official
in terms of the MoQ must be de-personalised.

We need to institute the group of interested parties (I've suggested
"Friends of Quality" or similar), and have the group appoint officers
(3 say) to apply editorial control on its behalf.

I'm really encouraged to see the efforts of Gav and Rebecca and David
(H) and others to establish "the point" and make constructive
progress. I've tried the same before. Let's learn from past mistakes.

Regards
Ian