[MD] Primer

[pholden at davtv.com]

Quoting gav <gav_gc at yahoo.com.au>:


> okay so here's my architectural idea:
> **3 parts:**
> 
> 1. quality is the fundamental 'stuff' of the universe.
> 
>  the highest most correct level. monistic, mystical.
> quality =immediate pre-intellectual experience
> experience produces subjects and objects; rather than
> subjects experiencing objects.

Quality is not a level.

 
> 2. Quality's first division: DQ/sq: the absolute and
> the relative; the unmanifest and the manifest.

There are no absolutes. 
 
> the next highest level. less correct or fundamental
> than 1. but more correct than 3.
> the code of art. the interdependence of the dynamic
> and the static. the reason why quality means different
> things to different people.

Quality is neither correct nor incorrect.

> 3. Static Quality divided into intellectual, social,
> biological, inorganic static patterns.
> 
> the evolutionary relationship between the discrete
> levels and the moral codes and conflicts their
> interplay produces.
> 
> these are the three different levels of the MOQ as far
> as i can tell; i believe a lot of our confusion comes
> from mixing these levels up. for instance the primary
> level - quality = pre-intellectual undivided exp - is
> still causing trouble becasue folk don't get it or
> don't get that it IS primary.

You've named five, not three levels. 

Off to a shaky start. :-)

 
 
 


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/