[MD] Flying Spagetti Monsters

Laycock, Jos (OSPT) Jos.Laycock at OFFSOL.GSI.GOV.UK
Thu Sep 28 01:28:21 PDT 2006


Stimulating yes, but damaging to the status quo nonetheless. As mentioned
the type of change you allude to stems from intellect so is moraly
jutifiable in overriding existing cultural patterns. The cultural patterns
themselves will not see it as positive however. To the culture it is damage,
to the intelectual it is a stimulant.

1) Attempting to state what is good is futile, when we recognise that a full
definition defies static explanation.
2) Good is dynamic
3) The absolute nature of static patterns (if that is even a valid concept)
are not visible to us, they are described by language in terms of shared
analogies, it is unlikely that these analogies are "accurate"
representations of the underlying paterns.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
> [mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org]On Behalf Of
> craigerb at comcast.net
> Sent: 27 September 2006 20:18
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] Flying Spagetti Monsters
> 
> 
> [Jos] 
> > one who disagrees with the cultural viewpoint...is a 
> damaging influnece on that culture. 
> 
> I heartily disagree.  Disagreeing with the viewpoint of a 
> culture is one of the most stimulating things one can do for it.
> 
> > 1) Stating what is good requires a static description. 
>  > 2) Good is dynamic. 
>  > 3) :. All static definitions are innaccurate. 
> 
> I could see if you tried to argue that language is dynamic, 
> therefore all definitions are inaccurrate.  But how does 3) 
> follow from 2)?
> Craig
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
> PLEASE NOTE: THE ABOVE MESSAGE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE INTERNET.
> On entering the GSI, this email was scanned for viruses by 
> the Government Secure Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service 
> supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with 
> MessageLabs.
> In case of problems, please call your organisational IT Helpdesk.
> The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed 
> service to achieve the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM 
> Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK Government quality 
> mark initiative for information security products and 
> services.  For more information about this please visit 
www.cctmark.gov.uk


This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the
addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not
permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies
and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be
intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding
whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored,
recorded and retained by the Department For Constitutional Affairs. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read
at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when
composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.



The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure Intranet (GSi)  virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK Government quality mark initiative for information security products and services.  For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list