[MD] Flying Spaghetti Monsters
Arlo Bensinger
ajb102 at psu.edu
Thu Sep 28 12:06:33 PDT 2006
[Craig]
I only have one thing to add to Platt's refutation of your post. Those who
defend the free market do NOT do so to protect wealth or the wealthy. They
do so because it is the best way to match rewards to worth for
everyone. In particular, patents & copyrights see that the efforts of
inventors, artists, authors & intellectuals are rewarded.
[Arlo]
By rewards, you mean the generation of wealth. The point is, there have to
be "rules of engagement" in the market. Can we agree on that? (I don't want
to recreate our last dialogue on this, I think we both made our points
clear). Short of this, perhaps (also using Platt's demand for specificity
in our other thread) we can bring this subject down from the abstract
"rules and regulations" and talk about some specific rules or regulations
you feel are "bad" and which ones you feel are "good". Also, return the
workplace pre-1895, and explain to me the ways the "worker" had it better.
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list