[MD] Mountain View
MarshaV
marshalz at charter.net
Thu Feb 8 02:36:49 PST 2007
Greetings,
A while back I was trying to explain that I thought interpreting the
Social & Intellectual Levels was so confusing because we are immersed
in them. Here is a far better description of what I was trying to
explain, but pertaining to art.
"On the other hand, all attempts to discover the essential properties
of art have been carried out through a search for common denominators
within art itself. However,when looking for the especially large
patterns of a particular territory it is sometimes necessary to climb
to heights much greater than the mountaintops in that
territory. Thus, for instance, if we seek to find the common
denominator of Libya, Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, and Turkey, the
intuitive reply is, "Trouble." But if this region is viewed from a
height of several dozen kilometers, it is easily seen that all these
nations have a common coastline.
Similarly, it is possible that the answer to the questions, "What is
the common denominator of works of art?" is not so evident at the
level of the works themselves; instead, we can discover it more
easily if we look for it from a height that allows us to see art as a
special case of a broader pattern that includes the other areas of
culture. Too many people are still trapped by the idea of the
importance of the definition of art, ..."
(Avital, 'ART versus NONART', p. 258)
The last sentence seems very relevant.
But this is just a reflection of my own confusion.
m
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list