[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)

[Ron Kulp]

The statement "Man is the measure of all things."  speaks for its' self,
got no problem with it, but
 then Micah makes the leap to
"Nothing can be shown to exist independent of humans" is an objective
statement. It is fact."

This seems to be the problem. How they got lumped together in his
philosophy
And interpreted to mean roughly the same thing and support eachother
Was the thrust of my question put to Micah. If he is going to make bold 
statements and declare them "fact"
He at least should explain himself as to how he arrived at this.
"Stating we're all too dense to get it" seems a rather poor way to leave
it.
I'd rather not alienate anyone, my aim is to understand, not to
Belittle him.