[MD] Global Warming: Science or Politics?

[Matt poot]

Hi heather et all,

I also watched the Inconverient Truth.  Apart from that, along with many in 
my generation (up an coming)  the environment has always remained at the top 
of my mind.

the carbon dioxide emmisions are indeed a counter to the argument that we 
are simply following a natural cycle.  Its not that we aren't on that cycle, 
but the key idea relates to how much we alter the speed in which the changes 
will come.

There are arguments that environmental responsiblity is economically 
disastrous, is as unbased and false as the final solution.  Contaminating 
every possible aspect of our environment with toxins may help to sustain the 
current economy, but is not the one method of practice that will continue a 
course of human evolution.

The media does seem to be playing the game as usual, but I don't mind it so 
much, because the only side affects will be positive.

However, there is still little change in actions for most people in N.A 
(cant speak for elsewhere).  While my house of 5 people and 2 cats creates 1 
bag of garbage every 2 weeks, my neighbours (nice people) with 2 people, 1 
baby, and a dog create 5 bags of garbage every two weeks.

logical?

most thing are very easy to change.  recycle everything you can (from toilet 
paper roll centres to ketchup bottles), and your garbage output will 
decrease at least 50 percent.


anyways, i've got to go now.  maybe someone can complete?


POOT


>From: Heather Perella <spiritualadirondack at yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>Subject: [MD]  Global Warming:  Science or Politics?
>Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:55:50 -0800 (PST)
>
>    [Arlo]
> > Some geological placement. The "normal" climate of
>the earth is
> > what we had for the millions and millions of years
>the dinosaurs
> > enjoyed....
>
>
>      This had to come up eventually, and since I saw
>the movie, "Inconvenient Truth", I might as well ask,
>has anybody else?
>      The chart in the movie (documentary?) that showed
>the amount of carbon was interesting where the carbon
>was measured through the last seven, I believe, ice
>ages.  The last carbon rise was off the chart (was the
>measure of carbon presently).
>      The movie had a mix of politics thrown in, but it
>seemed to be an effort by Gore to show his commitment
>to curbing Global Warming was a commitment that he was
>willing to take to the Presidency for at the end he
>said one way to stop Global Warming was to get
>involved in Politics.  Science mixed with politics,
>I'm sure this is an argument ready to burst.
>      I was watching the Weather Channel the other day,
>and I believe it is the show called Climate Code, in
>which the host made an announcement that the Weather
>Channel is dedicated to informing its' viewers.  She
>stated that the show, Climate Code, and the Weather
>Channel were in no way taking a political stance.
>They are just trying to inform their viewers of the
>current weather related science.  To even have to make
>this announcement shows where this Global Warming
>issue has headed.
>
>Global Warming:  Science or Politics?
>
>
>in the cold, food must be found,
>SA
>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast
>with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
>http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
>moq_discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

_________________________________________________________________
http://local.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=43.658648~-79.383962&style=r&lvl=15&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=3702663&cid=7ABE80D1746919B4!1329