[MD] the MOQ and its environment

[MarshaV]

At 06:28 AM 2/15/2007, Kevin wrote:
>Hello Marsha,
>
>I agree with your description of this forum.  But no description of 
>this forum will
>help identify the MOQ's environment unless of course this forum is that
>environment.
>
>One problem I have with the MOQ is that it does not exist in any 
>clear, concise
>form.  I can't go to any library or book store to obtain anything I 
>can point to and
>say truthfully that the Metaphysics of Quality is delineated 
>here.  So from this
>point of view the MOQ is imune from control because it doesn't exist 
>as an object
>that can be controlled.  Robert Pirsig came up with the concept be 
>he chose not
>to delineate it in any recognizable, objective form.
>
>And yet this forum continues to ruminate about the MOQ; what it says 
>and what it
>doesn't say.  People point to Pirsig's two books, what Anthony McWatt has
>published and other papers authored by Pirsig and other advocates of the MOQ.
>But there is still no consensus on what is the definitive 
>Metaphysics of Quality.
>
>Sincerely and honestly from my character and energy,
>


Hi Kevin,

It is stated that Buddhism is a religion of no-religion.  Maybe the 
MOQ is a metaphysics of no-metaphysics.  But of course, RMP can set 
the record straight if he chooses.

m