[MD] the MOQ and its environment

ian glendinning psybertron at gmail.com
Fri Feb 16 14:00:36 PST 2007


Hi Marsha, I didn't see the context of that remark, but I like awkward
questions :-)

You asked
>Are you wanting to put into the MOQ the sages/buddhas level?

I (and others) have made that kind of suggestion before, an
enlightened level at the top of or above the "traditional"
intellectual level. Yes, it may be a static pattern to name it and
place it there, but there is nothing says the MoQ can't support that
evolving to even higher levels of enlightenment (where we'll have to
find new words to describe what we're talking about.)

Ian

On 2/16/07, MarshaV <marshalz at charter.net> wrote:
> At 03:11 PM 2/16/2007, I wrote:
> >Marsha:
> >Are you wanting to put into the MOQ the sages/buddhas level?  Those
> >who have fully realized the view from above all levels?
>
> I admit this was very awkward question, since buddhas and sages would
> be a collection of static patterns of value.  Please disregard it.
>
> m
>



More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list