[MD] the MOQ and its environment

[MarshaV]

At 05:00 PM 2/16/2007, you wrote:
>Hi Marsha, I didn't see the context of that remark, but I like awkward
>questions :-)
>
>You asked
> >Are you wanting to put into the MOQ the sages/buddhas level?
>
>I (and others) have made that kind of suggestion before, an
>enlightened level at the top of or above the "traditional"
>intellectual level. Yes, it may be a static pattern to name it and
>place it there, but there is nothing says the MoQ can't support that
>evolving to even higher levels of enlightenment (where we'll have to
>find new words to describe what we're talking about.)
>
>Ian

Ian,

Interesting.  But still a Buddha or Sage is still a person, and a 
person would be comprised of spovs from the inorganic, biological, 
social and intellectual levels.

But thanks for the encouragement.

m