[MD] SOLAQI, Kant's TITs, chaos, and the S/I distinction

[MarshaV]

Hi SA


>Sqwish.  Sqwish.  -  Erase.  Erase.  Erase.

This was erasing the wish to know wormspeak.  Words have power.

>I've wondered about this confusion concerning the levels.  (Not that
>I truly understand the problem.)  They seem genius.  Here's my
>theory.  I think we stand in the shadow of the 'constellation of
>static patterns of value' that is 'self'.   OR..., meanwhile the
>planet is whimpering.
>

This was my theory that it may be difficult to sort the spovs into 
the proper level (social or intellectual) when sorting from the 
self-spovs, when in fact the spovs from all levels are creating that 
self.  It's hard to be objective, like trying to look into your own 
eyes.  (Hard to do unless you've seen from a new perspective, a 
Sage's perspective.) The shadow image was kind of fun because it can 
be associated with the Jungian idea of the Shadow too.  The 
'meanwhile the planet is whimpering' is impatience (a fault, maybe).

>Now if I could just put that into a visual.  Hmmmm.
>
>Sorry, but the moon is full.

Reference to a possible painting idea, and an apology for lunacy.

--------

I hope you aren't now going to lecture me about obscure language.


m