[MD] SOLAQI, Kant's TITs, chaos, and the S/I distinction

[Heather Perella]

     [Marsha]
> This was my theory that it may be difficult to sort
> the spovs into 
> the proper level (social or intellectual) when
> sorting from the 
> self-spovs,

     What do you mean by self-spovs?


     [Marsha]
> ...when in fact the spovs from all levels
> are creating that 
> self.  It's hard to be objective, like trying to
> look into your own 
> eyes.

     Basically what your saying, maybe, is we can't
define our true self completely objectively?  All the
levels help, but the levels include dq, all together
it's quality, and that would give us the whole
definition and fill in all the gaps.  So, to try to
rely upon the levels for a total definition is to miss
out on dq, which all together the true self is
experienced.  ???  So, therefore, understanding these
levels, and other aspects of our experience is to
eventually recognize, to use a familiar way of
understanding that I know, which is quiet.  Another
way to understand quiet to use MoQ terminology is
sq-latching-dq, and this is true self: code of art,
but sq can't latch dq, yet, that effort reveals true
self.  ???


cloudy, was blue sky,
SA

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com