[MD] A thread for mysticism and no one is allowed tomentionreligion

[David M]

nice!

David M

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Kulp" <RKulp at ebwalshinc.com>
To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] A thread for mysticism and no one is allowed 
tomentionreligion


> Q: what did the mystic say to the hot dog vendor?
> A: make me one with everything
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
> [mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of David M
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 4:16 PM
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Subject: Re: [MD] A thread for mysticism and no one is allowed to
> mentionreligion
>
> Hi DMB
>
> Good idea, I'm bored too. You kick us off and let's talk mysticism and
> no one is to mention the R-word.How can mysticism enhance the MOQ?
>
> David M
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "david buchanan" <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com>
> To: <moq_discuss at moqtalk.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 3:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)
>
>
>> Squonk predicted dmb's relply:
>> You retort: That's rubbish. Is that the best you can do?
>>
>> dmb says:
>> Exactly. T'was a big fat bucket of face-saving weasle words. Thank you
>
>> very
>> little.
>>
>> We all know that Pirsig has described the MOQ as anti-theistic. He's
> said
>> that only a mystic can rightly associate DQ and God. And nobody seems
> to
>> have an intelligent argument for theism. So why does the debate haunt
> us?
>> Why am I cast as the bad guy? For defending the obvious? Because I
> believe
>> nonsense shouldn't go unchallenged in a philosophy forum? If it
> weren't
>> for
>> the efforts of various stubborn and defensive theists this whole
> debate
>> should have disappeared long ago.
>>
>> I'm with Arlo. I think we could really benefit from Joseph Campbell on
>
>> this
>> topic and he illuminates Pirsig's work in other ways too. Wilber does
>> mysticism too. But none of them are theists. I mean, there are
> intelligent
>> things to say about that "spiritual" dimension but we never get around
> to
>> that discussion because we're too busy bullshitting around with thing
> like
>> "intelligent design".
>>
>> What a waste.
>>
>> What a drag.
>>
>> sigh.
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Get in the mood for Valentine's Day. View photos, recipes and more on
> your
>> Live.com page.
>> http://www.live.com/?addTemplate=ValentinesDay&ocid=T001MSN30A0701
>>
>> moq_discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>>
>
>
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> moq_discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>