[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?)

[Heather Perella]

Arlo,

     Arlo, you quoted from ZMM the chairman incident
and this in particular as follows:

          "All this is just an analogy"


     This intellectual statement I think highlights
how Pirsig pointed to the intellectual level better
than just saying S and O divide are upon the
intellectual level.  The divide of S and O doesn't
point at the intellect.  It says what the intellect
does with subjects and objects which can be trees, the
heart, etc...  Thus, S and O are anything.  Yet, this
one statement points directly at the intellect, and
says what the intellect does more descriptively.  I
take this statement further to mean trees, heart,
etc... for these are just analogies of ultimate
reality, too.  Instead of just saying S and O divided
is all the intellect does, which doesn't reach out
into the other levels, for the other levels don't
divide S and O, do they?  But this statement above is
more descriptive, more inclusive, and goes straight to
the point as to what static quality is, which is just
analogy of dq.

agree, disagree?


cloudy, snow on the earth, lovely day,
SA   


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail