[MD] Re-inventing the wheel.

[Heather Perella]

     [Bo]
> An aside from - but touching on - the SOL-ution
> thread. You seem to have re-enacted part of
Phaedrus' role in
> ZMM when confronted with the question if his Quality
was
> subjective (analogy) or objective (non-analogy).
This became an
> analysis of SOM, and if accepting my proposition
that
> SOM=Intellect, an analysis of intellect.

     I don't see subjective as analogy only, but I see
objective as analogy.  These are analogies of dq. 
When I see a rock, this rock is an analogy, not
different than what I can say, about ultimate reality,
which is nothing-is-static pattern.  I can't define
ultimate reality, and a rock can't either.  Only human
beings can chat about ultimate reality on this planet,
as far as I know.  Yet, rock does not side step into
its' own little ultimate reality different from
ultimate reality.       

     [Bo]
> Your conclusion (the 21 Jan) seems to be that
> intellect is nothing 
> but analogies. 

     Very real analogies of ultimate reality.  

     [SA previously]
> > What of the intellects
> > identification ability, the analogies made?  So,
> what the intellect does therefore what it is?  I
lean
> > towards yes, for if practice of what one preaches
> is as highly as we make it out to be, then an
> intellect that practices analogy and divide and
other
> activities is therefore just being what it is.

      [Bo]
> ...and this is identical to the subjective horn of
> Phaedrus' dilemma. 
> And if you would bother to read that passage in ZMM
> you will see 
> that even if Phaedrus was able to avoid the
> objective (non-
> analogy) horn he didn't like the other horn any
> better.

     I don't see these as subject and objective horns.
 Analogies at all levels.  


     [Bo] 
> By and by he goes on to understand that that Quality
> is the creator of both objectivity and subjectivity,
in
> your terms: "...the 
> creator of both analogies and non-analogies".

     I never said non-analogies.

     [Bo]
> Then the said proto-moq where "intellect" = the S/O
divide, or in
> your terms: 
> Intellect=the analogy/non-analogy DISTINCTION.

     Never said non-analogy.

     [Bo]
> If you are to re-invent the wheel you must complete
> its circle ;-)   

     That's an analogy, thanks.  It's all quality,
right?


snows, then freezing rain, then snows again,
SA
     




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail