[MD] dualism redux

[Kevin Perez]

Hello Ian,
 
> A lot of people come to that view and still hold it after much reflection.
> 
> Who was it said, that "in order to demonstrate the possible one
> sometimes has to do the impossible" ?
> 
> I look at it this way.
> In order to demonstrate that ZMM was "it" Pirsig had to write Lila.
 
I agree completely.  And this is why I see the MoQ as a conception.
 
> To use the language of the other mail
> Lila is the whole, ZMM is the part which contains the whole.
> 
> Depending where (part) you break into this loop / Quine, you get a
> different perspective, but it's the same (whole) loop you're in.
> Clearly to appreciate that, you have to appreciate both ZMM and Lila.
 
Thanks Ian.  Really.  Thanks for sharing your point of view.
 

Kevin

 
---------------------------------
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.