[MD] Oneness, Dualism & Intellect
Squonkriff at aol.com
Squonkriff at aol.com
Sat Mar 3 12:48:23 PST 2007
Quoting Mati Palm-Leis <mpalm at merr.com>:
> If you want a metaphysical understanding of Reality that does not delineate
> itself then you really aren't interested in metaphysics but reality itself.
> If so I humbly suggest a beautiful sunset, snow falling gently to earth, or
> a smile of child.
As I have often said, beauty guides us to what is most real. So I agree
with Mati's statement above and bring to your attention a clip from an
article in "Physics World" that points once again to beauty seen in places
not usually thought of:
"When the 14-year-old Richard Feynman first encountered eip + 1 = 0, the
future
physics Nobel laureate wrote in big, bold letters in his diary that it was
"the most remarkable formula in math". Stanford University mathematics
professor
Keith Devlin claims that "like a Shakespearean sonnet that captures the very
essence of love, or a painting that brings out the beauty of the human form
that
is far more than just skin deep, Euler's equation reaches down into the very
depths of existence". Meanwhile Paul Nahin - a retired US electrical
engineer
- says in his recent book, Dr Euler's Fabulous Formula, that the expression
sets
"the gold standard for mathematical beauty"."
(p in the above formula refers to pi)
Platt
Mark Hi Platt,
It's always wonderful to read people fascinating about beauty in an moq
context, as you do here.
May i venture to suggest that beauty is a central part of what i term
'Dynamic Pragmatism'?
There are many variations of pragmatism but the best yet developed in my
view is that by the moq.
Here, DQ and beauty are linked in a ways not yet fully explored or
appreciated by the moq community.
I feel the link is in the way sq relationships (including those of people
and the patterns they find beautiful) unify and become opaque to DQ.
As DQ is revealed in these unified relationships more the relationships may
be said to be more dynamic - what you term more, 'real?'
Love,
Mark
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list