[MD] The illusion that is subject

[Ham Priday]

[Quoting Ron]:


> Does "one-ness" mean the absence of opposites, 
> for if there were no opposites
> there would be no change
> no value
> no-thing
> does "one-ness" mean no-thing-ness?
>  
> is it that the subject is an illusion?

YES!!  You have just stated Cusa's theory of non-contrariety.

Congratulations,  
Ham