[MD] The illusion that is subject

[Ron Kulp]

Ham,
Bells are beginning to ring
Fancy this:
Lets negate Micahs statement
"Objective reality can not be proven to exist out side human awareness."
with
Human awareness can not be proven to exist outside of objective reality.

Curious, what value would you arrive at?

-Ron

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Ham Priday
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:59 AM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: Re: [MD] The illusion that is subject


[Quoting Ron]:


> Does "one-ness" mean the absence of opposites, for if there were no 
> opposites there would be no change no value no-thing does "one-ness" 
> mean no-thing-ness?
>  
> is it that the subject is an illusion?

YES!!  You have just stated Cusa's theory of non-contrariety.

Congratulations,
Ham 
 

moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/