[MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?) primary objectivity, allow me to interject

[Ron Kulp]

Chuck,
That's exactly my point.
-x 

-----Original Message-----
From: moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org
[mailto:moq_discuss-bounces at moqtalk.org] On Behalf Of Chuck
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 12:34 PM
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Subject: [MD] Dawkins a Materialist (is watching?) primary
objectivity,allow me to interject

Plain and simple, as you say, there is absolutely no reason that
objective reality must be primary to discuss it. Primary means (as I
understand it) coming first. That there is a objective part to our
reality allows us to discuss various "real" things (including subjective
ones) is not in question. We don't question that there is also a
subjective part to our experiences. But objectivity being primary is an
illusion that non-dualist are trying to expose. For those that
understand ZMM, Quality is primary, and sbjects and objects come after.
This does nothing except change where you place objects in terms of your
reality, so that you can better integrate all the things that confound
those who rely exclusively on "objectivity". 

Halfway through this, I realised that I was composing a sort of "primer"
on ZMM and that for anyone who read and understand it, this whole
paragraph is redundant. I suggest reading the book.




Check me out!

 
---------------------------------
Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peek at the forecast  with theYahoo!
Search weather shortcut.
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/