[MD] -elitist ideas

[MarshaV]

At 03:00 PM 3/19/2007, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>What????????   'Betterness' is not subjective because Quality is not
>subjective?  In a monist metaphysics, how is the comparison being
>executed?   I'm curious.
>
>[Arlo]
>So am I. Do you think Quality is subjective? How can Quality precede
>subject and objects but "value" be subjective? Does Quality not exist
>on the inorganic level, in your opinion?
>

Arlo,

You're answering a question with a question?

It's just that your explanation doesn't make any sense to me.  In my 
little world, Quality/DQ is not moral in any way, not 'betterness, 
and not comparative.  On the other hand, the SQ/SPoVs represented in 
the four levels is/are morality itself.  This morality is created 
through constant comparison and repetition.

Before the dynamic/static split, or when discussing DQ, the MOQ is a 
monistic.  There is no comparison possible.

Soooooooooooo, in a monist metaphysics, how is the comparison being 
implied by the word 'betterness' be executed?

m